International Association for Cryptologic Research

International Association
for Cryptologic Research

EUROCRYPT 2026

EUROCRYPT 2026 Artifacts


Artifacts

Fully-Adaptive Two-Round Threshold Schnorr Signatures from DDH
Paul Gerhart, Davide Li Calsi, Luigi Russo, and Dominique Schröder

Reducing the Number of Qubits in Quantum Discrete Logarithms on Elliptic Curves
Clémence Chevignard, Pierre-Alain Fouque, and André Schrottenloher

PERSEUS – Probabilistic Evaluation of Random Probing SEcurity Using Efficient Sampling
Sonia Belaïd and Gaëtan Cassiers

When Trying to Catch Cheaters Breaks the MPC: Breaking and Fixing Delayed Consistency Checks in Trident, Fantastic Four, SWIFT, and Quad
Andreas Brüggemann and Thomas Schneider

Two-Server Private Information Retrieval in Sublinear Time and Quasilinear Space
Alexandra Henzinger and Seyoon Ragavan

At-Compromise Security: The Case for Alert Blindness
Martin R. Albrecht, Simone Colombo, Benjamin Dowling, and Rikke Bjerg Jensen

DGSP: An Efficient Scalable Fully Dynamic Group Signature Scheme Using SPHINCS+
Mojtaba Fadavi, Seyyed Arash Azimi, Sabyasachi Karati, and Samuel Jaques

Attacks on Goldreich’s Pseudorandom Generators by Grouping and Solving
Ximing Fu, Mo Li, Shihan Lyu, and Chuanyi Liu

High-Precision Functional Bootstrapping for CKKS from Fourier Extension
Song Bian, Yunhao Fu, Ruiyu Shen, Haowen Pan, Anyu Wang, and Zhenyu Guan

Updatable Private Set Intersection from Symmetric-Key Techniques
Junxin Liu, Peihan Miao, Mike Rosulek, Xinyi Shi, and Jifeng Wang

Cool + Cruel = Dual, and New Benchmarks for Sparse LWE
Alexander Karenin, Elena Kirshanova, Julian Nowakowski, Eamonn W. Postlethwaite, Ludo Pulles, Paul Vié, and Fernando Virdia

Deep Neural Cryptography
David Gerault, Anna Hambitzer, Eyal Ronen, and Adi Shamir

Group Key Progression: Strong Security for Shared Persistent Data
Matilda Backendal, David Balbás, and Miro Haller

Key Attack on the ACDGV Matrix Encryption Scheme
Anmoal Porwal, Antonia Wachter-Zeh, and Pierre Loidreau

When the Wrong Key Lives On: The Key-Recovery Procedure in Integral Attacks
Christof Beierle, Gregor Leander, and Yevhen Perehuda

Wedges, Oil, and Vinegar: An Analysis of UOV in the Exterior Algebra
Lars Ran



Scope and Aims

The two main goals of the artifact review process are to improve functionality and reusability of artifacts to enable reproduction and extension by the scientific community.

Reproducibility, in the context of computational experiments, means that the scientific results claimed can be obtained by a different team using the original authors’ artifacts. The artifact review process does not include attempting to reproduce the experiment and to verify the scientific claims in the accepted paper. Rather, the artifact review process aims at ensuring sufficient functionality of the artifact to enable a research team to attempt to reproduce the results.

Examples of this in the field of cryptography include:

Where possible, such as in software-based artifacts relying solely on open-source components, the artifact review process will aim to run the artifact and test harness, and see that it produces outputs that would be required to assess the artifact against results in the paper. For artifacts that depend on commercial tools or specialized physical hardware, the goal of the artifact review process will be to confirm that the artifacts are functional, and could plausibly be used by someone with access to the appropriate tools to reproduce the results.

Reusability means that the artifacts are not just functional, but of sufficient quality that they could be extended and reused by others. Reusable artifacts have clear user and developer documentation, and are well-structured in ways that make them easy to modify or extend.

For more information, please see the EUROCRYPT 2026 Call for Artifacts.



EUROCRYPT 2026 Artifact Review Committee

Artifact Review Chair:

Artifact Review Committee Members:

Contact: [email protected]